Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Who Defines Beauty?


Last week at work, when walking to the break room, I ran into a customer I haven't seen in over a year. "You've lost weight!" he exclaims. I nod and then he says, "But you've lost too much; now you've lost all of your curves." A few months ago, again at work, a fellow co-worker and I were discussing better employment opportunities. I mention being a beverage server at the higher class casino in our town, and he looks me up and down before saying, "They have appearance requirements. You're pretty enough, but you're sort of shaped like a boy." When the thousands of people relink my weight loss pictures all over the internet, over half of the comments made are not congratulating me for setting a personal and healthy goal and successfully reaching it, but instead making degrading, abrasive comments regarding my body and what it should be and mentioning how I look fake and anorexic. On a fashion forum once, there was a discussion about curvy body types and how to dress them. When I gave advice based on my own experience as a curvy girl, I was met with derisive laughter and being openly told one has to have curves to be curvy.  Does any of this sound familiar yet?

I'm sure we've all seen that picture circulating Facebook and other social media websites. You know which I mean, too. The top row had a few pictures of smaller women in bikinis and then another row of voluptuous pin-up girls, with text that read, "When did this... become hotter than this?" And inevitably, it was relinked all over the internet, with people heralding curvy women and shaming any other woman who didn't fit into this body type. When that picture was linked on Facebook, the comments were cruel and insulting, ranging from men making the absurd claim that anyone who is attracted to skinny women are pedophiles to hordes of women teaming up together in attacks on what a REAL woman is. Never mind the fact that we can't control where we gain or lose fat- and yes, as beautiful as curves are, they are technically fat- and that only 8% of women even have hourglass figures. What about the women who are naturally very skinny and have been teased for not being womanly their entire lives? What about my best friend, who looks at pictures of small-waisted, large-hipped women and suddenly feels down about her body because she looks like neither category of women represented in all of these arguments? Why does society feel compelled to attack all other body types in order to make another more accepted?

Real women this, real women thatWhat is a real woman, I ask you? I see that phrase thrown around so much, and I don't even think most women or even men know what they really mean. The definition even seems to change based on context. Is a woman more or less real because of something as arbitrary or uncontrollable as her body type? So if a woman lacks a generous bosom, does that somehow make her less of a woman? If she gets breast implants because society has told her she wasn't womanly enough, is she now somehow a fake woman? Oh, so it's the fake breasts that somehow make her less womanly. Well, on that note: do you use a bronzer or tanning lotion? Hair extensions? Make-up? Hair dye? Fake nails? Push-up bras? Even clothes can be considered as appearance enhancers! Who are we to judge other women for enhancing or changing their bodies when most of us do it too? 

Why is it unacceptable for society to imply anything over a certain weight is unattractive, but not unacceptable for us to say, "Shame on you, society, for imposing such high standards on women and making us insecure. We oppose your warped standards, and we think beauty is arbitrary and not defined by your laundry list of expectations." By putting down any other women for their appearance- whether natural or altered- you are essentially not just throwing stones back at the media, but at every other woman. In fact, you're doing exactly what the media has been doing to us. If you really want to make a difference, then oppose the media, and oppose any silly standards that claim you are only attractive if you fit certain criteria!- but not other women. In fact, most women feel most unattractive because of comments made and judgement passed by their own peers rather than the subliminal messages made by the media.  All women are real women, and all women are beautiful, whether we're your personal cup of tea or not. It might start with the media, but it ends with us

14 comments:

Lila said...

Only 3 entries and I already love this blog.
Keep doing what you are doing! I'm so happy that you help girls being happier!
My best wishes!

Yair said...

I like the way you think.
thanks for being an inspiration

criss said...

Thank you, guys!

Christine said...

Really great thoughts :) I fail to see why people have the need to body shame/bash every body type out there!

The Doctor said...

Really well-written and to the point. A great article, and so true.

- The Doctor

E said...

Multiple things! Where to start.

I work at Unilever (the company behind Dove, Suave, Axe, TRESemme, St Ives, and many many more). I work in the portion of the business that makes "Personal Care" products, primarily hair care, skin care, skin cleansing, and deodorant (I work in hair). The mode of thought that we're trying to improve inside the company is "beauty-mindedness." We want people thinking in terms of helping our consumers feel beautiful as much as thinking about the science of how to clean hair/skin, care for hair/skin, etc. I am part of a team that is supposed to improve this mindset in the company (I was engaged to make sure they had men involved o.o). I also happen to be a philosopher.

The blaring issue that I had from the start was simple: What is "beauty?"

*My* answer to that question is that beauty is a flexible and personal concept. It is relative, it is somewhat arbitrary, and even more so than many similar things, it is culturally influenced. There is a socially agreed upon definition of what is "beautiful" in specific situations (like what a beautiful woman is). For the sake of my company, I had to point rather overtly to the team that *we* as a company are playing an important role in informing the social definition of beauty.

There was a time when a beautiful woman was the Botticellian concept. By today's standard she would be "fat," and have small breasts (at least by visual media standards), but at the time she was healthy (note that it wasn't obese, just 3-dimensional), and the healthy ideal meant that you could actually manage to eat enough every day. The pin-up age of beauty accentuated the hourglass concept, and had a resurgence of appreciation of the corset, but still featured what might be currently considered "thick" women (again, not obese, but strong, 3-dimensional). This concept of beauty was no longer based on being fortunate enough not to be malnourished, but now to be able to accentuate the classically womanly features: child-bearing-ready hips and ample breasts (the upper half portion that reminds you it is not a man). To really accentuate the two, it helped to have a narrow waste, but this early learning in media went too far eventually (of course), and would even depict women with an abdomen so narrow that she would not be able to bear children (corset infatuation).

(Sorry, character limit means this will take a couple...)

E said...

Today more than any previous period, beauty and culture happen on a global scale and involve almost incomprehensible amounts of visual media being shared openly. Cultures still set their own standards, but we are seeing more people than ever before, not just what is printed/photographed/painted for public consumption (consider, during the previous periods you very rarely ever saw any depiction of someone that wasn't carefully chosen and/or selected for the audience).

We, as Americans, are faced with a (now) very visible issue with health and nutrition and the resulting obesity issues. Activity levels demanded by our lifestyle have plummeted. As we become part of a massive network, convenience means I can live and work and acquire all I need without doing anything more physically demanding than walking to the kitchen. Food (like most things) is sold to meet the desires/tastes/palettes of the consumer, and things like fat and sugar are tasty. Without an understanding of balanced nutrition, all people understand is what tastes good.

The result: unhealthy, overweight, minimally-active people.

The now pervasive, unfiltered, visual media lets us see this in gory detail. The instinctual response? Skinnier! Losing weight is good! It must be, look how fat people are. Then the easy next step, the misstep: taking a good direction too far. Skinnier and skinnier, until you see the depictions of "look how skinny this model/actress is! How beautiful." Skinny gets worshiped for a while before people start to catch on that it is not a unidirectional thing. Now we are starting to back-swing. Extreme skinniness is seen as excessive and unhealthy the way obesity has been, and we start to see a return to appreciating thickness.

One of the essential problems of the media, however, is the (rapidly becoming antiquated) presentation of a single shape as the "right/good/beautiful" shape. This "ideal" shape is socially informed, and (subconsciously, usually) agreed upon.

E said...

Now, there are physical cues that feed physical attraction and can be linked to mate selection (ideal genetic pairing for optimizing survival ability of offspring, if you buy into that theory). But even these things can be influenced by the ever-evolving cultural definition of what a beautiful woman (or man) is, or more, we have learned how to over-accentuate those ideal qualities for the sake of appealing to pre-conscious perception.

The truth, the reality that I think our visual media will show as the new system allows everyone to show any and every person, is that people come in all shapes and sizes.

On a related and appropriately timed thing, my company just opened up for a new campaign. Dove has been on a "Real Women" kick for years, and they're kicking off a MASSIVE project to really take that to the next level. Dove.com/ShowUsYourSkin If you are interested in checking it out.

Here is a *crucial* issue, though, that I think goes unnoticed.

You pointed out something I have seen from most women I know. They look at media and measure themselves by what they see. Somewhere along the lines, women started believing that the media should be telling them how they should look. Granted, most people have bought into that and accepted it, *but* it is a faulty conclusion.

Confidence is not a product of external praise, nor is a lack of confidence a product of external criticism. Confidence is an internal product. Confidence comes from accepting yourself. Accepting yourself does not require you to meet any standard that is offered externally, and only willingly buying into the external standards to use as your own can result in society undermining your appreciation of yourself. Unfortunately, this happens all the time.

Now, I know this is easy to say, but hard to accept. We are all willing participants in society. In our culture, we have lost the understanding that we can and should find our own answers, particularly when it comes to matters that involve taking care of ourselves.

E said...

I firmly believe that if you listen to your body, it will tell you everything you need to know about how to take care of yourself, you only have to learn how to listen. And in this age we have reached, we also need to learn how to *not* set our standards solely by what people tell us we should feel. When you become truly skilled at listening to your body, you can find your own health. You don't need someone to tell you how to eat, you pay attention and feel the effects of your food; you don't eat more than you need, you eat slowly and patiently and your body tells you when enough is enough; you exercise because you feel what it offers, strength, energy level, and innumerable ancillary benefits, you find balance.

I firmly believe that you can and should find acceptance of yourself before/during any of any of the physical healthening starts. To be most effective in listening you must first accept who and where you are before you can really choose your own next steps (if you don't accept yourself as you are, first, you are not really listening to yourself!).
That said, from a place of physical health it is *easy* to find emotional health because you are not measuring yourself against external/artificial standards. You are listening to your body, feeling good physically, and so you *know* you are the best form of you. Beyond that, nothing really matters for your personal well-being or appearance. From that *knowing*, no one can *make* you feel bad about yourself with their ignorance or application of artificial standards.

It would be wonderful to work the social/cultural mindset back to one that encourages this kind of health and attentiveness. I suspect that if we were all so good at listening we wouldn't find people feeling the need to tell others how they should look, eat, or behave. But for now, we need to start by keeping our own house in order. As the popular Gandhi quote goes, "Be the change you want to see in the world." *Be* healthy. *Be* happy. *Be* confident. When that becomes the norm, we may find a healthy balance of beauty, health, and social interaction again.

Accept yourself, love yourself, no matter what. If you listen to your body and you feel like there is something you can do to help it work better, try it and listen to what happens. Be patient, be loving. If you are really present with yourself, you might just find you don't care what other people think you "should" look like.


- Ethan (Satorri)

E said...

Egad. That is longer than I thought...

Sorry for blogging on your blog? >.>

sophiajenner said...

Well said Criss, I dream of a world in which all body types are celebrated. I think people see a silly picture like that, and repost it before thinking about what it actually says, and how offensive it really is. x

Rachel and Ben said...

I find it baffling that you would even get such responses. I have been so inspired by your before and after photos. I too am a paler-than-southern-society-allows, girl and one of the first things I said upon viewing your amazing photos are, "She still has curves, breasts and thighs, that's awesome" I'm not sure what people think is curvy-only fat? Thank you for the inspiration, as always.

On a side note, I get a little lost between sites, twitter, etc...where can I find your progress/during/steps you took?

Thanks!~Rachel

Catherine said...

Ok, besides that customer being a little rude, and all women even without larger breasts or hips ALSO being beautiful- "lost all your curves"- What?! I'm with Rachel- what does he think the things below and above your waist are? Right angles?

Larissa Ace said...

It will be true that the colors of women wear also need to be chosen carefully as the clothing they choose should match their complexion.

Post a Comment

 

Template by Suck my Lolly